Steps to writing a journal article review

You are expected to read the article carefully, analyse it, and evaluate the quality and originality of the research, as well as its relevance and presentation. Its strengths and weaknesses are assessed, followed by its overall value. Do not be confused by the term critique: You should address both the positive and negative aspects.

Steps to writing a journal article review

One of the most important parts of professionalization is being able to publish your research. I was lucky enough to be in a department that had a yearlong seminar dedicated to just that: But that was just the first step.

Related Reading

One of the things you should always do before submitting a paper is read articles published by the journal to which you are submitting to get a sense of the conversations being had in its pages and to find a model for your own work.

Despite such idiosyncrasies, knowing a few things about the purposes and format of a journal article will help you get published. You should understand the function of each section and write accordingly. The purpose of this section is threefold. First, you want to trace previous work on the subject and set up the problem.

Second, you need to identify how your paper addresses that problem.

How to Write an Article Review (with Sample Reviews) - wikiHow

Finally, you should note the broader contributions and implications of the piece. Reviewing previous work is necessary but not sufficient.

The purpose of this section goes beyond an accounting of what others have done. One way to understand the purpose of the theoretical framework is to see it as leading your reader through gaps in the literature that your paper addresses.

It also includes information that your reader needs to know in order to understand your argument. For example, you should incorporate any relevant foundational texts.

Leave A Comment

One of the things you see in general journals is that the theoretical framework is often divided into two sections, precisely because general journals want papers that speak to multiple audiences. So one section of your theoretical framework can deal with one set of literature, while the next section deals with another.

Part of your contribution can be uniting and filling in the gaps in both sets. The theoretical framework often gets a bad reputation in the peer-review process, because reviewer comments often make suggestions regarding the theoretical framing of a manuscript.

But I see the framework of a paper to be one of its most central parts. If we view research as a conversation, then the framework signals who you are in conversation with -- that is, the relevant audience and broader contributions of your work.

steps to writing a journal article review

Sometimes a case-study section that gives background information on your specific case follows the theoretical framework. For example, for a City and Community article, I created a section dedicated just to explaining the history of the Subic Bay Freeport Zone in the Philippines, because it was background that my readers needed to understand the data but not part of my results.

On what kind of information or material are you basing your findings e. How did you find that information, or where did it come from e. Census, National Archives, fieldwork? How did you analyze that information?

That is, what software or analytic strategies did you use to come up with your findings? This section contains the meat of the paper, where you present the findings from your work, and you should keep two points in mind.

First, make sure that your results speak to the theoretical and empirical questions that your paper raises in the front half -- in other words, that your paper is cohesive throughout. Second, and particularly for qualitative papers, organize your results analytically or thematically -- not, for example, in chronological order or according to some other simple accounting.

You should be thoughtful about how to present your results to get the most out of your findings. For some reason, academics like the number three, so you will often see three main results in a given paper.

Purdue OWL // Purdue Writing Lab

You may also find a combined discussion and conclusion at the end of the paper. What are the differences between a discussion and a conclusion? One way you can think about it is that the discussion section allows you to step back from the results section and reflect on the broader story or themes of your results and how they tie together.

If you see a discussion section this way, then you can think about a conclusion as addressing three things: These tips will not guarantee you publication in a given journal.

In addition, you also still have to do your due diligence about where to send your paper, including which journal is a good fit, the specific format of its articles and the types of conversations that are within its pages. Bio Victoria Reyes is a sociologist whose work examines how culture shapes global inequality.

· Selecting a topic to write an article for a research journal is not just easy but it is the most important part to begin with and choosing the relevant topic to focus A literature review can be an informative, critical, and useful synthesis of a particular topic.

It can identify what is known (and unknown) in the subject area, identify areas of controversy or debate, and help formulate questions that need further  · Writing a Critical Review What is a critical review?

A critical review is a review of an article that combines a summary and a critical comment. 2. steps in the argument that are not logical 3. any additional purposes of the article that are not explicitly In our previous article, we discussed the first 5 steps in writing an effective Case, let us look at the remaining 5 steps.

Step 6: Deciding the Contents of the Case Report. Summarize the information that you have Choose a painting (or other work of art). Let your eye rest on a work of art that attracts you for any reason whatsoever (because you love it, .

· How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS Last Edited 4/9/ Page 1 of 2 So your assignment is to critique a journal /76//03/

Scholastica: Academic journal management software